BLS Revises U.S. Job Gains Down by Nearly 1 Million, Marking Largest Adjustment on Record
Benchmarking cuts employment growth between April 2024 and March 2025 by 911,000, underscoring a weaker labor market than previously reported

The Bureau of Labor Statistics on Tuesday said U.S. employers added 911,000 fewer jobs between April 2024 and March 2025 than previously reported, a revision that reduces estimated employment growth in that 12-month span to about 850,000 and appears to be the largest correction to federal employment data on record.
The agency said the change results from its routine benchmarking process, which uses administrative payroll and state unemployment records to adjust previously reported survey-based estimates. The updated figures are considered preliminary and are subject to finalization early next year.
The revision sharpens a picture of a substantially cooler jobs market in 2024 and early 2025 than earlier reports suggested. The adjustment follows a separate monthly report last week that showed hiring slowed in August, with just 22,000 jobs added and the unemployment rate ticking up to 4.3 percent. That monthly release also recorded a 13,000-job decline in June — the first net drop in employment since late 2020.
Economists and analysts said the benchmarking correction is a standard statistical practice meant to align survey responses with administrative records and does not by itself indicate data manipulation. The revision, however, arrived amid political controversy over the BLS after President Donald Trump dismissed Commissioner Erika McEntarfer last month following a weak monthly report. The president accused the agency of producing data he said had been "rigged" to make him and Republican policies look bad; Trump has not produced evidence substantiating the claim.
The personnel change at the agency has drawn scrutiny from labor economists and policy makers. Trump has nominated E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to lead the BLS. Antoni was a contributor to the group's Project 2025 plan and was publicly noted to have been outside the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack; the White House has characterized him as a "bystander" that day.
Officials in the administration have pushed back against the optics of weaker job reports. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick dismissed the August employment report and said the White House expects a surge in hiring, despite the recent downward revisions and signs of slowing in monthly data.
This revision follows another substantial adjustment made last year, when federal data was rebenchmarked to show 818,000 fewer jobs were created in the year ending March 2024 than previously reported. Together, the back-to-back large downward revisions indicate the labor market added far fewer positions across consecutive reporting windows than earlier estimates implied.
Labor-market indicators remain mixed. The unemployment rate at 4.3 percent is low by historical standards, yet payroll gains have trended weaker in recent months and revisions have diminished the cumulative job-growth totals for the last two annual benchmarking cycles. Analysts note that benchmarking, which happens every few years, often reduces sampling error from household and establishment surveys but can produce sizable changes to the employment record.
The BLS said the revised estimates provide a clearer baseline for assessing economic trends before the policy changes enacted since President Trump took office, including higher tariffs and tightened immigration rules, which economists say can weigh on hiring. The agency emphasized that the new numbers help align survey-based monthly estimates with more comprehensive administrative data.
Markets and policy makers will watch whether the preliminary revisions are confirmed in final benchmarking and how the weaker employment picture influences Federal Reserve decisions on interest rates and fiscal discussions in Washington. For now, the revised figures are likely to temper narratives of robust job growth in 2024 and early 2025 and to sharpen debate over how personnel and policy changes at the BLS could affect public confidence in the nation’s official labor statistics.