Customers report lost parcels, animal casualties and withheld deliveries as Royal Mail struggles to meet targets
Performance figures show first- and second-class deliveries well below Ofcom standards while high‑profile takeover and price rises coincide with growing customer complaints

Royal Mail has faced a string of customer complaints and high‑profile service failures as performance metrics show the national postal operator increasingly missing delivery targets.
Industry figures for the period between the end of March and June showed 75.9% of first‑class letters and 89.3% of second‑class post were delivered on time, well under the standards that regulators expect for universal postal service provision. Ofcom is due to lower statutory targets from April next year — first‑class next‑day delivery from 93% to 90% and second‑class three‑day delivery from 98.5% to 95% — but even with those changes the recent performance figures are far below the thresholds.
Behind the numbers, customers have described incidents ranging from the inconvenient to the distressing. One Putney resident, Julia Stephenson, told reporters that a dispute following an incident in which her dog bit a postal worker led to two months without deliveries and, on visiting a local sorting office, the discovery of three batches of dead ladybirds and a packet of dead worms that she had ordered online. Royal Mail said deliveries to the address were suspended after a postie suffered a second dog bite requiring hospital treatment and that deliveries resumed after assurances the dog would be contained; the company apologised for the delay in explaining the suspension.
In another case, a groom‑to‑be, Alex Kozlowski, said a three‑piece suit intended for his father did not arrive ahead of a March wedding despite being posted through the Royal Mail. He said the suit was mislabelled at the Post Office with an Amazon QR code and that tracking records showed the package accepted as an Amazon return. Royal Mail told him it was likely the item had already been delivered back to Amazon and that because the return postage was arranged by Amazon any claim must be raised through the retailer. Kozlowski said he received no meaningful response in time and bought a replacement suit for the wedding; his original claim remains unresolved more than three months later.
Other reported incidents include a hamlet in east Devon where Royal Mail temporarily suspended deliveries, telling residents that a private, winding access road was too poor for safe delivery. A 62‑year‑old resident with multiple sclerosis said she was left without deliveries for a month and was instructed to collect post from a neighbouring town 14 miles away; Royal Mail said the suspension followed concerns from the local delivery team about the road's quality and that it was reassessing the arrangement.
There have also been high‑profile individual losses that have prompted criticism of the company's handling and compensation policies. One bereaved mother reported that her son's ashes, sent first class, were lost; Royal Mail said the parcel had been mailed to the wrong address and that existing compensation rules limited payouts because the contents were deemed to have no "intrinsic value." The company issued a small goodwill payment and expressed regret for the loss.
Royal Mail has said in statements that the safety of its employees is the priority in cases involving dog attacks, that delivery suspensions should have been communicated more promptly, and that it is taking steps to improve reliability. An interim chief operating officer, Jamie Stephenson, said timely letter deliveries matter to customers and that the company was taking targeted steps to improve performance and recruit frontline staff to make the network "more reliable and resilient." A Royal Mail spokesperson also defended the handling of returns, saying high volumes can mean not every item is scanned at every stage and that return claims arranged by a retailer should generally be raised with that retailer.
The service's troubles coincide with a change of ownership and rising prices. International Distributions Services, Royal Mail's parent company, was taken over last year by Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky's EP Group for £3.6 billion, a sale that prompted a government review because of the postal network's strategic role. Kretinsky said after the takeover that employees and customers would be "at the heart" of the business. In April Royal Mail increased the price of a first‑class stamp to £1.70.
The operator is also contending with long‑term structural change: letter volumes have fallen sharply over two decades, from roughly 20 billion items a year about 20 years ago to about 6.6 billion in 2023/24. That reduction in letter traffic has coincided with rising costs, reliance on parcel revenues and heightened competition from private couriers for time‑sensitive deliveries.
Regulatory adjustments and promises of recruitment address some operational pressures, but customer reports of lost items, poor communication and difficult local interactions have fuelled public frustration. Consumer groups and trade associations have urged greater clarity on compensation, improved tracking and more consistent customer service. Royal Mail has said it will continue to work to improve services and to address specific local delivery issues.
Ofcom sets and enforces the standards for universal postal services in the UK and will monitor whether Royal Mail meets its obligations as targets change. The regulator did not comment beyond the published targets. As the company seeks to stabilise performance under new ownership and amid a changing market, customers and local communities say timely, reliable deliveries remain an urgent concern.