express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Monday, February 23, 2026

Disney chief Iger reinstates Jimmy Kimmel amid backlash over suspension

Report says Iger moved to bring back the late-night host after controversy began affecting his wife’s social life; Eisner criticizes leadership, while stars spoke out in support of Kimmel before the decision.

Business & Markets 5 months ago
Disney chief Iger reinstates Jimmy Kimmel amid backlash over suspension

Disney chief executive officer Bob Iger has reinstated Jimmy Kimmel after the late-night host’s suspension drew swift backlash and, according to a new report, began to affect Iger and his wife’s social circle. Puck described Iger, 74, as alarmed by Hollywood’s reaction to the suspension and particularly distressed by how it touched Willow Bay, the dean of the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. The report notes that a fundraiser planned at the Iger home in Los Angeles faced the threat of cancellation as the host committee considered pulling out over the controversy.

Before ABC announced Kimmel’s return, a trio of high-profile voices weighed in on the suspension. Pedro Pascal and Lin-Manuel Miranda publicly criticized the move, and Iger was described by Puck as “thin-skinned,” with insiders saying the scale of global criticism was “crushing.” The report highlights that Iger was most affected by public criticism from former Disney chief Michael Eisner, who blasted the suspension on X with the line: “Where has all the leadership gone?” Insiders described their relationship as tense; Iger is said to have been loath to Eisner, who reportedly humiliated him during the succession process two decades ago. Eisner’s remarks were viewed by some as a proxy for a broader debate inside the company about how to handle sensitive programming and on-air personnel.

The suspension, the report notes, came as ABC’s parent company was already navigating several high-profile tensions. Eisner’s critique suggested a different approach, with the former CEO reportedly hinting he would have used leverage against affiliate owners Sinclair and Nexstar, which have said they will not air Kimmel’s show. The report emphasizes that Kimmel’s absence had the potential to ripple through Disney’s affiliate network, given the show’s long run and the company’s highly visible late-night strategy.

Kimmel’s suspension had stemmed from remarks in which he suggested that the shooter in a widely reported case was associated with the MAGA movement, a characterization he later said he did not intend to imply. The hiatus ended the week before ABC publicly announced that Kimmel would return. In the interim, the network faced questions about tolerance for satire and the boundaries of on-air commentary, as critics argued about the balance between free expression and accountability.

When Kimmel returned to the air on a Tuesday, he delivered a tearful 20-minute monologue in which he said he never intended to make light of the murder associated with the case and used the moment to condemn censorship. He told viewers that placing him back on the air “was taking an enormous risk” for his employer of more than 20 years. He framed the moment as a defense of free speech, saying, “A government threat to silence a comedian the government doesn’t like is anti-American.” The monologue drew a standing ovation, but Kimmel also acknowledged the political heat and the broader sensitivities raised by his remarks.

The public relaunch did little to quiet the conversation around leadership at Disney. Kimmel’s return was described as a calculated decision designed to balance the show’s long history with the broader political and cultural climate. As the controversy subsided, the conversation shifted to whether the network would face continuing pressure from critics and whether the company’s leadership would pursue structural changes in response to this incident. The report also notes that executives and affiliates continued to monitor sentiment after the return, with some commentators arguing that the host’s-page controversies would leave a lasting mark on how Disney handles public figures and risk in its programming.

The family-linked backdrop remains a factor in Iger’s decision-making, with Willow Bay’s position as a leading figure in journalism education adding another layer to the dynamics surrounding the company’s public-facing challenges. The image accompanying this report shows Iger with Bay at a public event in 2012, highlighting the close connections that can become part of corporate leadership narratives when personal and professional lines intersect.

Disney representatives did not publicly comment on the report’s specifics, but the company has faced ongoing scrutiny over its handling of high-profile personalities and the messaging surrounding them. In the weeks since Kimmel’s suspension and return, observers have continued to weigh the implications for Disney’s brand, shareholder perceptions, and the broader market’s view of how the company balances comedy, controversy, and corporate governance. The story, sourced in part to Daily Mail reporting, underscores how a corporate leader’s responses to cultural flashpoints can reverberate across leadership, media relations, and investor sentiment.


Sources