express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Thursday, March 5, 2026

Guzman y Gomez shares slump as costly US expansion alarms investors

Fast-food chain posts record sales and higher profit but stock nears record lows amid concerns over weaker comps, softer margins and mounting US losses

Business & Markets 6 months ago
Guzman y Gomez shares slump as costly US expansion alarms investors

Guzman y Gomez Holdings Ltd. shares fell to near record lows on Tuesday as investors reacted to the Australian fast-food chain’s aggressive expansion into the United States and signs of softer trading metrics.

The company, which listed on the Australian Securities Exchange in June last year, debuted at $22 and climbed into the mid‑$40s within months. It was trading around $24 on Tuesday, well below its earlier peak. The share-price fall follows Guzman y Gomez’s late‑August report of record network sales exceeding A$1 billion and a more than doubling of full‑year profit to A$14.5 million for the 2025 financial year.

Despite the headline result, investors sent the stock lower after the company disclosed weaker‑than‑expected comparable sales, softer margins and rising losses tied to its US rollout. Shares dropped about 20 percent in the immediate aftermath of the results, according to market commentary.

Analysts and market participants said the share weakness reflected growing concern that Guzman y Gomez’s US strategy is not yet delivering the returns investors had been sold during its initial public offering. "This was a super‑hot IPO. Its listing price was $22, it surged to $45, and today it's trading back around $25," said Gigi Penna, principal at Caldera House. "The IPO pitch was all about raising capital to expand into global markets, particularly the US. But I believe their US expansion just isn't going well."

The company said it had made "significant progress" in the US, citing 57 percent total network sales growth in the final quarter of the year. Co‑founder Steven Marks described the financial year as "exceptional," saying global network sales grew 23 percent and the group finished the year with 256 restaurants worldwide after opening 39 new sites.

Guzman y Gomez’s global footprint now includes just under 100 restaurants in Australia and seven stores in the US, all located in the Chicago area. The company also opened four restaurants in Singapore and one in Japan during the period, and said its Australian network had seen strong growth in late‑night and breakfast trading, with 18 restaurants operating 24/7.

Investors and commentators have raised questions about the chain’s ability to compete in the US, where established local and regional Mexican food operators and a vibrant street‑food scene create a crowded market. Online commentary cited in media reports questioned whether the brand’s offering would resonate with American consumers accustomed to a wide variety of authentic Mexican cuisine.

Company executives defended the expansion strategy, pointing to growth in systemwide sales and an expanded development pipeline. Guzman y Gomez said it has 98 locations in its Australian pipeline and an "incredible real estate team," and indicated plans to continue rolling out 24/7 trading across its domestic network.

The market reaction highlights the tensions for growth‑oriented restaurant chains that trade on aggressive international rollouts: strong headline sales and profit gains can mask underlying pressures such as margin compression and higher losses from early stage foreign operations. Analysts said the near‑term outlook for the stock will hinge on whether Guzman y Gomez can improve comparable‑store sales, tighten margins and demonstrate the US stores can become profitable as the network scales.

Investors will also be watching forthcoming trading updates and quarterly results for clearer evidence that the chain’s international expansion is tracking toward the profitability profile outlined at the IPO. For now, the combination of elevated expectations from the listing and the newer disclosures of softer trading metrics appears to have left the company's shares at a significant discount to their early post‑listing highs.


Sources