Colbert Targets Trump as White House Autopen Portrait Sparks Audience Booing
Late-night host questions motive behind White House portrait swap showing Biden as autopen; audience reaction underscores a culture-war moment in politics and entertainment

A late-night pivot in a political and cultural swirl drew attention Thursday night as Stephen Colbert used his show to lambaste Donald Trump over a White House display that replaced Joe Biden’s portrait with an image of an autopen. Colbert’s audience reacted with loud boos as a clip aired showing the walking-gallery portraits that flank the covered walkway from the White House residence to the West Wing. The sequence, described by the White House as part of a broader communication framing, features former presidents alongside Biden depicted as signing with an autopen. Colbert seized on the moment, telling viewers, “Trump always, always has an ulterior motive, and it’s always being a jerk,” before noting the video’s effect on the audience and the broader political chatter around the display.
The image in question is said to hang along the Presidential Walk of Fame, a gallery-like corridor that leads between the main residence and the West Wing. Above the portraits, the gold lettering reportedly reads “The Presidential Walk of Fame,” and the display places headshots of former presidents beside Biden, who appears as an autopen signer rather than a living figure. The clip referenced by Colbert shows a stark contrast between Obama in the lineup and the Biden portrayal, with the latter presented as if his signature were produced by a device rather than a person. The White House has tied the visual to President Trump’s longstanding criticisms of Biden’s decision-making cadence late in his term, a debate that has taken on new life in public and media forums.
Colbert’s reactions followed a fuller context of the autopen debate. Trump has acknowledged that his administration has used the autopen to affix his signature to letters to Americans, though he has emphasized that it was not used to sign legislation. In a speech at the Department of Justice in May, Trump contended that relying on the autopen for presidential actions was preferable to handling signings personally, a stance he framed as respect for the office while criticizing Biden’s approach. Colbert challenged the persistence of Trump’s autopen critique, suggesting the former president’s critique rings hollow when Trump himself has endorsed similar uses of the device.
The autopen itself is a long-standing instrument in U.S. governance. The mechanism’s roots trace back to Thomas Jefferson, the third president, who began using an early version in 1804, a fact cited by historians as an early emblem of efficiency in executive signaling. The modern version of the device emerged with Harry S. Truman, expanding the tool’s reach across federal leadership. Barack Obama is noted in historical summaries as one of the presidents who used autopen to sign legislation, adding a complex layer to any discussion of presidential signature practices. The conversation surrounding Biden’s autopen use—whether it signals diminished decision-making or is a routine administrative tool—has been described by Trump as a point of contention in credibility and capability, a theme that has resonated within partisan media coverage and public discourse alike.
As Colbert wove the autopen narrative into his monologue, the program highlighted how a symbolic portrait swap can reverberate beyond a single administration. The host’s commentary reflected a broader entertainment-media environment where political satire intersects with official symbolism, drawing attention to the ways in which government imagery can become a focal point for public reactions and media framing.
In a separate thread of entertainment industry news, reports circulating in July indicated that CBS announced the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, following publicized tensions surrounding a high-profile settlement the network reached with Trump. The agreement, reported as a $16 million settlement, was described by Colbert on-air at the time as a “big fat bribe” from the network’s perspective, a characterization that fueled speculation about the show’s future. Executives stated that The Late Show, which launched in 2015, would end in May 2026, signaling a planned phaseout of the franchise after Colbert’s tenure ends. A CBS spokesperson framed the decision as recognizing Colbert’s indispensability while noting the long arc of the host’s career on the network. Trump publicly denied that his influence caused Colbert’s rumored departure, arguing that the show’s fate hinged on talent and ratings rather than outside pressure.
The evolving story lines—ranging from White House portrait symbolism to late-night television continuity—illustrate how entertainment and politics continue to collide in the public imagination. Colbert’s Thursday-night moment underscored a broader pattern in which satire becomes a vehicle for airing grievances about presidential authority and media narratives, while the autopen discourse itself feeds into a larger conversation about the tools presidents use to act when public visibility and political capital are at stake.
As audiences reflect on the visual symbolism of presidential portraits and the digital-age questions about authenticity and procedural tools, the Autopen controversy remains a touchstone for debates over executive power, media representation, and the cultural role of late-night television in shaping how Americans interpret leadership decisions. The interplay of humor, authority, and object lessons—such as a portrait replaced by a device—continues to illustrate the modern frontiers of culture and entertainment, where a single image can become a catalyst for discussion across political and artistic lines.