express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Friday, January 23, 2026

Jimmy Kimmel Breaks Silence With First Post Since ABC Suspension

The late-night host returns to social media with a tribute post amid a controversy over remarks about Charlie Kirk and mounting network and affiliate pushback.

Culture & Entertainment 4 months ago
Jimmy Kimmel Breaks Silence With First Post Since ABC Suspension

Jimmy Kimmel broke his silence on social media Tuesday, posting for the first time since ABC pulled Jimmy Kimmel Live! from its lineup last week amid a controversy sparked by his remarks about conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The late-night host’s Instagram message appeared to be a strategic nod to the ongoing free-speech debate roiling networks and affiliate stations, and it comes as networks and unions navigate the boundary between political satire and real-world consequences.

In the post, Kimmel shared a photo with Norman Lear, the veteran TV producer best known for groundbreaking shows such as All in the Family and The Jeffersons and a longtime defender of the First Amendment. The caption, "Missing this guy today," was interpreted by many fans as a signal tied to Lear’s legacy of pushing boundaries in television and culture. Lear died in December 2023, and his influence on late-night and social commentary remains a touchstone for supporters who view Kimmel’s remarks through a similar lens of provocative, boundary-pushing discourse.

The broader context involves ABC’s decision to suspend the program after Nexstar Media Group, which operates numerous local stations nationwide, pressed for a pause pending review of Kimmel’s remarks about Kirk. The suspension was described by ABC as an indefinite pre-emption while the matter was addressed. The episode has intensified a national debate over free speech, political satire and the role of late-night hosts in a polarized political landscape, with supporters arguing that critics are attempting to chill satire and suppress dissenting viewpoints.

In the days surrounding the suspension, a broad coalition of entertainers and civil-rights advocates voiced support for free expression. The ACLU, along with high-profile figures such as Robert De Niro, Jane Fonda, Ben Affleck, Jamie Lee Curtis, Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep, signed an open letter urging defenders of First Amendment rights not to yield to government pressure. The letter described government threats to creative voices as a dangerous intrusion on constitutional freedoms and urged Americans to stand with artists and journalists in defense of free speech.

Meanwhile, Disney acknowledged the backlash and moved to lift the indefinite hiatus once pressure from affiliates and industry groups grew. The turnaround reflected a broader push to resolve the dispute and a belief among many stakeholders that public figures and programs should be allowed to pursue satire without facing punitive financial or logistical retaliation.

Kimmel’s remarks, delivered during a September monologue, touched on the divisive climate surrounding political discourse and media coverage. While he has not publicly apologized for his comments, supporters argue that the rapid back-and-forth among networks, affiliates and advocacy groups underscores the importance of protecting a wide range of voices in the media landscape. Critics, however, have urged accountability and direct engagement with the parties involved.

Industry observers note that the episode highlights the fragility of late-night television in a era of heightened political intensity and high-stakes corporate diplomacy. With ABC, Disney, Nexstar and Sinclair affiliates navigating a complex web of advertisers, local stations and national standards, the path to resuming normal programming remains contingent on how the parties address concerns about content, context and consequences. As of now, there is no clear timetable for when Jimmy Kimmel Live! will return to its regular nightly slot, and the network has said it will communicate updates as decisions are made.

The episode represents a broader reckoning about the responsibilities of comedians and broadcasters in a country fundamentally divided over issues of speech, power and accountability. For now, Kimmel’s social-media return and the subsequent corporate responses mark a notable moment in the ongoing conversation about the limits and protections of satirical commentary in American culture.


Sources