Ollie Davidson’s divorce from Bonnie Blue tied up in £34 million fortune dispute

Ollie Davidson’s divorce from Bonnie Blue has become entwined with a bitter dispute over her wealth, with his mother claiming he may receive nothing from what is estimated to be a multimillion-pound fortune as the separation moves toward finalisation.

Gill Davidson told the Daily Mail that her son has been cut out of Bonnie Blue’s earnings and that a decision has effectively left him without a financial stake in the assets she has built since their marriage. She said Ollie has been informed he has no financial claim because the money, she argues, belongs to Bonnie’s body of work and careers, which she has built largely through her adult entertainment brand.

![]https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/09/26/16/102481929-0-image-m-32_1758900332667.jpg

Blue, whose real name is Tia Billinger, rose to notoriety by offering free sexual encounters to students in exchange for filmed interactions, a profile that has made her one of the most controversial figures in the world of adult entertainment. Despite the couple’s public arguments about money, Ollie has publicly supported his wife’s career in past interviews, even as tensions have grown behind closed doors.

The two met as schoolchildren and were childhood sweethearts who later married in 2022 after a decade together. Their path included stints abroad, including two years on Australia’s Gold Coast, before they returned to the United Kingdom last year. During the Australian period, Blue pivoted toward online content and cam work, with Ollie by her side in a managerial capacity. She has described him as a supportive partner who helped lay the groundwork for her rise in the industry.

While forum chatter has swirled around the couple’s ongoing split, evidence of strain has appeared in public moments, including Davidson wearing what looked like a wedding ring during a recent rugby match for Long Eaton RFC. Photographs circulated suggesting the ring was covered with tape, a visual cue at odds with the notion of a clean separation, though it remains unclear whether the gesture carries personal significance or simply a practical measure for the game.

The financial tension comes as Blue’s public persona expands beyond the screen. She has claimed to earn substantial sums—estimates in coverage place her monthly income in the seven-figure range at times—and has continued to project a lifestyle of luxury with a growing team behind her brand. In interviews and media appearances, she has framed her work as a family-inclusive enterprise, sometimes suggesting that her husband would benefit from shared success. Her mother-in-law’s account, however, portrays a different dynamic: that Ollie supported Blue professionally but is now being shut out of any proceeds from her wealth.

The dispute unfolds against a backdrop of Blue’s provocative public stunts, including a highly publicized event in which she claimed to have sex with more than a thousand men in a single session, a stunt that has only intensified scrutiny of her career and its financial underpinnings. Blue has asserted that her work has evolved the adult entertainment landscape by enabling fans to connect with performers in real time, a model that has attracted a dedicated following and significant earnings.

Ollie Davidson’s family has publicly framed the matter as a struggle between a once-inseparable couple and a rising entertainment empire. The Davids ons, including Ollie’s father Karl, have historically supported their son while expressing reservations about the direction of Blue’s career. Blue has acknowledged that her relationship with Ollie waned over time, describing a non-dramatic separation rather than a contentious fallout tied to her profession, though the new legal and financial tensions suggest the exact nature of the split is more fraught.

Officials and close observers have cautioned against predictions about how the fortune will be divided, noting that divorce settlements in high-wealth cases can hinge on complex asset structures, prenuptial considerations, and the exact terms of ownership in ventures tied to the spouse’s brand. In the meantime, Gill Davidson has said she and her husband are eager for the divorce to be finalized and to distance their family from the notoriety surrounding Blue’s career and the publicity it has generated around their son’s life.

The story, part family drama, part business dispute, continues to unfold as legal representatives prepare for the next steps in the divorce process. For now, the public narrative remains anchored in questions about ownership, entitlement, and how a life built in the limelight translates to financial claims within a marriage that has itself become a cultural talking point.