The 'dangerous' destinations that aren’t as scary as they seem
A Culture Trip ranking highlights Medellin, Rwanda, the Balkans and more as welcoming, safe escapes once feared for safety or culture.

Travelers often let safety fears, weather expectations, or concerns about authenticity shape their itineraries. A Culture Trip report identifies ten destinations that people commonly worry about visiting but should consider, arguing that many places once perceived as dangerous are now welcoming, accessible options for exploration. Medellin, Colombia, tops the list, described as a vibrant and energetic city that has moved beyond its notorious past.
Medellin’s history includes links to drug cartels and Pablo Escobar, but visitors now find graffiti-lined streets, thriving local art, and a growing culinary scene. The city blends modern development with urban culture, offering cable-car rides, parks, and hillside neighborhoods that illustrate resilience and renewal.
Rwanda, in East Africa, ranked second. The country has become a magnet for safaris that offer up-close encounters with elephants, gorillas, and other wildlife, alongside efforts to conserve habitats and showcase cultural heritage. The appeal extends beyond wildlife viewing to experiences that connect visitors with local communities and histories, underscoring a broader push toward sustainable tourism.
The Balkans, a southeastern European peninsula, placed third. The region is generally considered safe for tourists, offering a mix of coastal scenery, mountain landscapes, and historic towns that reflect a long, complex history. Travel writing and visitor accounts highlight picturesque sites and enduring hospitality as part of the region’s growing appeal.
Saudi Arabia followed in fourth place, with recent openness drawing travelers to ancient desert sites, including the Nabatean ruins in AlUla and the tombs of Mada’in Saleh. The country is widely regarded as safe due to strict laws and enforcement, but visitors should conduct independent research into laws and cultural norms. There are expectations for men and women to dress modestly, and homosexuality remains illegal. Unmarried (straight or gay) couples can stay in the same hotel room together, a policy noted in recent travel discussions.
Queensland, Australia, ranked fifth, drawing visitors with sweeping white-sand beaches, the colorful coral of the Great Barrier Reef, lush rainforests, and abundant wildlife. The region’s expansive coastline and terrestrial ecosystems offer a wide range of outdoor experiences that attract travelers seeking both relaxation and adventure.
India ranked sixth, while Nigeria, Singapore, Tunisia, and Transylvania (Romania) rounded out the top ten. The list underscores a broad geographic span and a variety of cultural experiences—from megacities and wildlife safaris to ancient ruins and UNESCO-listed landscapes—challenging common perceptions about safety and accessibility for tourists.
The Culture Trip assessment reflects a broader shift in travel thinking: destinations once deemed risky are increasingly perceived as viable, welcoming options for visitors. While the rankings emphasize safety and hospitality, they also remind travelers to verify current local conditions, laws, and norms before planning trips, and to approach each destination with updated, independent research. In an era of evolving travel narratives, these locations illustrate how perception can lag behind reality, offering opportunities for discovery across continents.