Jamie Oliver reveals neurodivergent diagnoses in wife and children, prompting health debate
The chef says his wife Jools is neurodivergent and that some of their five children have diagnoses, as experts explain what the term means and why diagnoses are rising.

Jamie Oliver has disclosed that his wife, Jools, is neurodivergent, and that some of their five children have been diagnosed with conditions such as dyslexia, ADHD and autism spectrum disorder. Speaking on Davina McCall’s Begin Again podcast, the 50-year-old chef described Jools as the rock of the family and said she has “incredible instinct” and a sense of humor, adding that she has “neurodiversities that make her life really interesting and really challenging.” He also joked about managing a household with multiple neurodivergent individuals, saying, “Imagine four neurodiverse people at the dinner table trying to get their point across.” Oliver has previously discussed his own dyslexia and said the revelation has prompted varied reactions online, with readers debating what the label means and whether it is being overapplied or misunderstood.
The discussion comes amid a broader public conversation about what it means to be neurodivergent. Experts note that the term originated in the late 1990s with Australian sociologist Judy Singer, who argued that conditions such as autism and dyslexia should be seen on a natural brain spectrum rather than as defects. Today, neurodivergent is used as an umbrella term for a range of conditions, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia and dyspraxia. It is not itself a diagnosis, but a way of describing people whose brains function differently from what is considered typical. Oliver, who has dyslexia, says his family’s experiences have helped them understand their children’s behavior as differing perceptions rather than deliberate misbehavior, reinforcing the idea that families may adapt parenting approaches accordingly.
The Oliver family’s dynamic includes five children—Poppy, 23; Daisy, 22; Petal, 16; Buddy, 14; and River, eight—though Oliver has not specified which child has which condition. He said some of the diagnoses emerged within the past year, and he has emphasized that understanding how his children see things differently has helped him and Jools become better parents. The public conversation around the family reflects a wider trend: while many people welcome greater openness about neurodiversity, others question whether labels are being used too freely or as a form of excuse. Critics have argued that not every moment of forgetfulness, restlessness or disorganization constitutes a medical condition, a point some clinicians say warrants careful assessment.
Experts have stressed that neurodivergence is a spectrum and that overlap between conditions is common. In many parts of the world, rates of neurodivergence appear to be rising, driven in part by increased recognition and diagnosis, as well as greater public awareness. Data from the United Kingdom show substantial demand for ADHD assessments, with NHS figures indicating that more than 549,000 people in England were waiting for an ADHD assessment at the end of March 2025—up from 416,000 the year prior. Of those waiting, about 304,000 had been waiting at least a year, and 144,000 for two years or more, underscoring how access to assessment can lag behind rising interest in identification and support.
Global estimates place neurodivergence at roughly 15 percent of the population, with autism spectrum disorders affecting about 1 in 100 people in the UK and ADHD affecting around 4 percent. The numbers can vary by country and by the methods used to measure them, and many people have more than one condition. Researchers note that autism and ADHD commonly co-occur; some studies estimate that 50 to 70 percent of people with autism also have ADHD. The rise in diagnoses has been linked in part to greater awareness and changes in screening practices, as well as concerns about social media’s role in shaping perceptions of “normal” behavior.
The conversation around neurodivergence has entered celebrity culture as well, with figures such as Greta Thunberg, Sue Perkins, Rory Bremner and Olivia Attwood publicly discussing their own neurodivergent experiences. While openness can reduce stigma and promote understanding, some experts warn that the rapid spread of terms on social media may blur distinctions between everyday traits and clinical conditions. Dr. Dinesh Bhugra, a consultant psychiatrist, cautioned that while discussing mental health openly is important, there is a danger in turning common traits into medical diagnoses or encouraging people to pursue treatment for normal variations in mood or attention.
Bhugra warned that platforms and public figures can influence teenagers to equate ordinary experiences—like forgetfulness, distractibility or discomfort in noisy settings—with a medical disorder, potentially widening the pool of people seeking diagnoses. He stressed the importance of rigorous evaluation by trained clinicians: “Being easily distracted, or drifting off while someone’s talking to you; hating being in busy, noisy environments; forgetting your keys. These are normal feelings, emotions and actions, part of the hugely diverse spectrum of being human.” Other medical researchers have also urged caution about self-diagnosis and the reliability of tests when not conducted by professionals.
Beyond clinical diagnosis, the popularity of neurodiversity as an identity has spawned a broad range of community resources, including support groups and advocacy campaigns, which some people say offer validation and practical strategies for navigating education and employment. At the same time, researchers caution that not every behavior labeled as neurodivergent reflects a diagnosable condition, and that accurate assessment remains essential for access to targeted services and supports. Studies assessing ADHD diagnoses and their drivers have highlighted the influence of social media, as well as gaps in primary-care pathways, suggesting that better screening, training, and access are needed to ensure that those with genuine needs receive appropriate assistance.
As the conversation around Jamie Oliver’s family continues, advocates say the focus should stay on ensuring understanding, reducing stigma and expanding access to assessment and supports for those who need them. The chef has indicated that acknowledging neurodiversity within his home has helped them parent with greater clarity and empathy, a takeaway that aligns with a growing emphasis on inclusive approaches in health, education and social care.