Promising Mets deadline moves turn disastrous as two acquisitions falter
Two of four deadline additions have underperformed, undermining a season that once echoed last year’s deadline success.

The Mets' bid to sustain a late-season surge has hit a snag, with two of four players acquired at this season's trade deadline turning into colossal disappointments and undermining the club’s playoff push. The moves come after a 2024 deadline that reshaped the roster and helped drive a wildcard berth and a run to the NLCS, a performance many had hoped would be a blueprint for sustained contention under Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns.
Last year's deadline package included Jesse Winker, Ryne Stanek, Phil Maton, Huascar Brazobán and Paul Blackburn. Winker, Stanek and Maton were particularly valuable in reinvigorating the club and stabilizing a faltering stretch run, contributing depth that allowed the Mets to stay in the postseason chase and push toward a deeper October run. This season, by contrast, Stearns pursued a similar multi-player deadline maneuver, adding four players in the closing days of the trade window. But the returns have been uneven: two acquisitions have underperformed or fallen well short of expectations, complicating the team's plans for a strong finish and testing the front office's approach to building a contending roster.
The sharp contrast between last year’s results and this year’s fallout has intensified scrutiny of how aggressively the Mets have ridden the deadline strategy as a core component of their competitiveness. Analysts and supporters alike note that the 2024 haul helped catalyze momentum through the final weeks, while the current season’s four-player package has failed to deliver comparable impact in the decisive run toward October. The situation underscores the high-stakes nature of deadline moves and the challenge of translating peripheral upgrades into consistent on-field returns over a long, grueling season.
With the calendar pressing into the final stretch, the Mets face a choice: maximize what remains from the deadline acquisitions, seek further adjustments, or lean more heavily on internal development to sustain contention. The outcome of these decisions will shape not only the trajectory of this season but also the broader narrative around Stearns's strategy and the franchise’s ability to sustain a window of competitive relevance in the near term.