express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Thursday, January 1, 2026

New AI apps aim to protect rental drivers from disputed damage fees

Consumer tools such as Proofr use time-stamped photos, AI change detection and encryption to counter automated inspection billing by rental companies

Technology & AI 4 months ago
New AI apps aim to protect rental drivers from disputed damage fees

Rental car customers are increasingly turning to consumer-facing artificial intelligence tools to document vehicle condition and contest surprise damage charges after firms began using automated inspection systems.

Major rental companies including Hertz and Sixt have rolled out automated scanners and software to detect scratches, dents and other blemishes during returns. While firms say the systems speed inspections and reduce human error, some renters have reported being billed for minor or preexisting damage, prompting a backlash and legal complaints in some cases.

Proofr, which launched recently, is one of several apps now marketing AI-backed evidence-gathering to renters. The app guides users through a photo capture process before and after a rental, applies algorithms to detect even subtle changes in a vehicle’s exterior and stores the resulting images with time stamps and encryption intended to preserve a verifiable chain of custody.

Developers describe the combination of automated change detection and tamper-resistant storage as a way to produce contestable evidence when a customer disputes an inspection report. The apps typically generate before-and-after image sets, highlight detected differences using AI, and store metadata such as timestamps and device information that proponents say can support a consumer’s claim.

Rental operators and technology vendors have been deploying automated inspection hardware and software for several years. Companies that supply inspection systems say the technology can speed the check-in process, create detailed records and reduce subjective human judgments. At the same time, some renters and consumer advocates contend the systems can flag trivial blemishes or preexisting marks that were missed during pickup, exposing customers to unexpected fees.

Companies that produce commercial inspection scanners and services also publish documentation and images showing their hardware in use at rental facilities.

Inspection scanners at a facility

The consumer apps do not alter how rental companies process claims, but they provide customers with a structured record to use in disputes. Some apps emphasize encryption and secure storage so images cannot be edited after capture; others focus on usability, walking drivers through standardized photo angles and lighting checks to improve the quality of evidence.

The effectiveness of consumer photo records in resolving disputes depends on several factors, including how rental companies handle third-party evidence, the clarity and completeness of the images, and the timing of complaints. Automated inspection systems used by rental firms produce their own records and may detect damage at higher resolution or with different measurement thresholds than a consumer’s smartphone photos.

Industry attorneys and consumer advocates say documentation that establishes the condition of a vehicle at pickup and return can be helpful in disputes, but they also note that outcomes vary by company policies and local regulations. Some renters have reported successful reversals of charges after providing independent documentation, while others say disputes remained unresolved.

As automated inspection technology expands in the rental industry, consumer-facing apps aim to give renters tools to protect themselves and to create a more balanced evidentiary record. Adoption of those tools and their acceptance by rental firms will determine how often independent AI-backed photo records influence billing outcomes.

The trend reflects a broader push to apply AI and secure digital records in everyday consumer transactions, including those in mobility and transportation services. Companies on both sides of the dispute say technology can improve transparency, though customers and vendors may continue to disagree over standards for what constitutes billable damage.


Sources