Conservative group targets Trump in 57-second ad aimed at the manosphere
Home of the Brave launches a montage featuring Rogan and other podcasters decrying Trump over free-speech policy, with a week-long rollout across 28 YouTube channels.

A conservative nonprofit group is rolling out a 57-second online ad aimed at the manosphere, a segment of the internet often credited with helping rally support for Donald Trump in the 2024 election cycle. The montage from Home of the Brave stitches together clips from podcast hosts including Joe Rogan, Akaash Singh and Tim Dillon to critique the former president’s stance on free speech. The campaign is set to run for one week, starting Sept. 25, across 28 YouTube channels tied to male-audience programs, as well as channels associated with major sports and entertainment platforms. The broad reach across Rogan’s channel and others of similar audiences underscores a strategy to influence online spaces where antiestablishment and alternative-media narratives have circulated in recent years.
According to a press release from the group, the ad leans on criticism from prominent conservatives who once backed Trump but have faulted his approach to free speech. The release describes the administration’s actions as a major attack on freedom of speech, a core constitutional freedom and a pillar of democracy. The effort is part of Home of the Brave’s broader mission to spotlight what it says are harms associated with Trump’s second-term policy agenda. The campaign also targets streams on NFL, UFC and ESPN College Football channels as part of a cross-platform push.
Home of the Brave, launched in June, seeks to emphasize the perceived consequences of Trump’s policy positions. Its advisory board includes high-profile conservatives such as longtime GOP strategist Sarah Longwell, attorney George Conway and former federal judge J. Michael Luttig, underscoring the nonprofit’s effort to marshal prominent Republican voices in its messaging.
The new ad campaign reflects the ongoing effort by advocacy organizations to reach audiences in digital and nontraditional media environments. By focusing on the manosphere and other online communities that skew male, Home of the Brave aims to broaden its reach beyond traditional political outlets during a period of intensified scrutiny over free-speech debates and Trump’s rhetoric about censorship. The organizers describe the montage as illustrative of a broader concern among social and political watchdogs that targeted speech restrictions could shape public discourse and policy moving forward.
While the effort is clearly aimed at shaping opinion in online spaces, observers note that the campaign taps into a familiar dynamic: political messaging increasingly travels through alternative media ecosystems that sometimes operate with minimal editorial oversight. The plan to broadcast across a network of popular podcast channels alongside sports and entertainment outlets highlights a trend of cross-platform political outreach designed to engage voters who may not consistently follow traditional political coverage. Whether the montage resonates with viewers remains to be seen, but it represents a calculated attempt to insert a specific critique of Trump into conversations where his influence remains strong.
The release from Home of the Brave frames the ad as part of a larger project that the group has pursued since its launch in June. By foregrounding issues related to free speech and constitutional rights, the organization aims to mobilize supporters around perceived threats to civil liberties in the context of current policy debates. The initiative also signals how groups on the political right and center-left are increasingly coordinating messaging across media platforms to reach audiences where they spend their time online, including content creators who have historically drawn large male viewership.
As the week-long rollout unfolds, observers will closely watch how social-media distribution and engagement patterns unfold on the targeted channels. If the ad gains traction, it could intensify the ongoing discourse around free-speech protections in the political arena and offer a fresh example of how issue-based messaging is being deployed inside and outside traditional newsrooms.