UVU confronts unwanted infamy after Charlie Kirk shooting
Utah Valley University grapples with national attention and the challenge of healing after the campus killing of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY in Orem, Utah, faced national attention after the Sept. 10 shooting that killed Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, as he spoke to a rally at an outdoor amphitheater on campus. UVU, a sprawling campus of nearly 50,000 students beneath the Wasatch Mountains, had long prided itself on safety; the killing shattered that image and thrust the university into the national debate over campus violence and political polarization.
University leaders emphasized safety; UVU's latest data from the U.S. Department of Education show minimal violence on the main campus in recent years: four aggravated assaults, 13 rape allegations, one arson report, and no murders or manslaughter in 2021-2023. Spokeswoman Ellen Treanor said Kirk's killing was the first murder administrators are aware of on campus. Kyle Reyes, a university vice president, said the school intends to be a model of healing and civil dialogue. "We know that the eyes are on us and we’re not going to shy away from demonstrating our resilience collectively on this," Reyes said.
Students like Marjorie Holt, an 18-year-old elementary education student who arrived minutes before the rally, described fear and grief but also a sense of unity. Holt said she felt the university had failed Kirk and his family by not providing better security, and she worried about returning to a building near the crime scene. Yet she also said the tragedy has brought UVU closer. "We're all people who, you know, loved him or hated him," she said of Kirk. "We're all still coming together no matter how we believed, and I feel like this has made our school closer than ever."
When students returned to classes, the atmosphere was noticeably quieter. Matthew Caldwell, 24, recalled in history class that the moment felt different: "it felt as if the professor was more understanding of all beliefs and that ultimately it’s about sharing those beliefs." Popular student leader remarks followed as the campus community tried to process the loss and find a path forward.
Student body President Kyle Cullimore urged his classmates during a Friday vigil to stop putting labels on one another and see each other as human so that UVU can be a "place where disagreement doesn’t erase our dignity." The moment reflected a broader aim to balance free expression with a climate of mutual respect in a campus accustomed to open dialogue amid political divides.
As UVU absorbs the notoriety, historians and local observers question how the university should frame its identity going forward. The shootings of recent decades have left distinct templates for campuses: Columbine’s emphasis on security training and mental health outreach; Evergreen High School’s test of district preparedness; Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, and Parkland spurring gun-control activism and debates about campus safety; and Kent State’s legacy of balancing accountability with freedom of expression.
Johanna Solomon, a Kent State University professor and expert on campus crises, noted that leaders face a stark choice after such events. "Leaders have a really stark choice after things like this happen, and one is to lean into division and the other side is to humanize people, to bring people together." UVU officials cite those kinds of lessons as they begin to reshape the school’s narrative around resilience and dialogue rather than infamy.
Republican Utah Gov. Spencer Cox visited UVU and met with a small group on campus, acknowledging the trauma while stressing that the world should learn the broader story of the university beyond the shooting. "It has been rough, right, for all of us," Cox said. "The world only knows one thing about UVU now, and I want everyone to know the rest of the story. This place is incredible and it’s incredible because of the students that are here, amazing faculty." He added that meaningful change will not come from politicians alone but from the students and faculty who shape the campus culture.
Looking ahead, university leaders say safety and healing will guide their actions, even as they grapple with questions about memorials, security investments, and how to foster constructive dialogue on controversial topics. UVU’s leadership emphasizes resilience, openness, and a renewed commitment to serving a diverse student body in a time of national political polarization, with an eye toward rebuilding trust and a sense of community on campus.