express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Sunday, March 1, 2026

Whoopi Goldberg, The View address Jimmy Kimmel suspension, defend free speech on air

The View hosts push back on government pressure as ABC’s Kimmel suspension drags on

US Politics 5 months ago
Whoopi Goldberg, The View address Jimmy Kimmel suspension, defend free speech on air

Nearly a week after Jimmy Kimmel Live! was indefinitely paused, The View hosts addressed the suspension on Monday, signaling that the conversation would not be avoided any longer. Whoopi Goldberg opened the discussion by asking, “Did y’all really think we weren’t going to talk about Jimmy Kimmel?” and adding, “No one silences us.” The co-hosts noted that they had waited to see whether Kimmel would publicly respond to the controversy surrounding his monologue about Charlie Kirk’s death and President Trump’s reaction to it, alongside Nexstar Media’s expressed objection and a vow by FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr to consider a formal probe.

ABC’s decision to pull the show last Wednesday followed Kimmel’s remarks about Kirk’s murder, which sparked a backlash that the network described as unacceptable for local affiliates. Kimmel has not issued a public statement since the suspension, though reports and photographs showed him smirking at his lawyer’s office. Goldberg and her colleagues argued that the government should not have the power to silence a program, calling it a troubling development for press freedom in the country.

The panel used the moment to reiterate a commitment to First Amendment protections. Goldberg said the group had discussed freedom of speech extensively on a program that has aired since 1997 and that they would defend everyone’s right to express themselves, even if some findings or statements are controversial. “The government cannot apply pressure to force someone to be silenced,” she asserted. Ana Navarro, who has appeared as a guest host, argued that the country’s First Amendment was designed to hold those in power accountable and that government pressure to silence media is reminiscent of autocratic tactics.

Alyssa Farrah Griffin, another frequent contributor, echoed Navarro by stressing that “the First Amendment is the first for a reason” and that a free press is essential to a functioning democracy. The discussion touched on broader industry support for Kimmel, with Colbert, Meyers and Fallon among those who publicly voiced protection for free expression in the wake of the suspension. Colbert’s own show has been in the spotlight recently as the late-night landscape shifts, while Meyers and Fallon were praised by supporters for standing up for speech without fear of government interference.

The View’s on-air exchange came as a broader conversation about media independence intensified across entertainment and political discourse. The co-hosts argued that a government response aimed at silencing a program sets a dangerous precedent for press freedom and democratic norms. The debate also touched on reactions from other public figures who weighed in on the issue in defense of Kimmel and the principle of open inquiry.

Howard Stern added to the chorus of critics, blasting ABC’s decision as “ridiculous” and opting to boycott by canceling his Disney+ subscription. Stern told his audience that government interference in media on the basis of displeasure with a host’s remarks represents a troubling trend away from the ideals on which the country was founded. The executive actions and public responses to Kimmel’s suspension continue to fuel discussions about accountability, censorship, and the boundaries of commentary in the United States.

As the media landscape grapples with contentious rhetoric and the role of late-night hosts in political discourse, The View’s panel stressed that the United States must balance accountability with protections for speech. The participants did not prescribe a fixed resolution, but they underscored a commitment to maintaining a forum where outspoken viewpoints can be aired and debated. The episode closed with a reaffirmation of the importance of free expression, even amid controversy, and with a reminder that critics and supporters alike will be watching how the situation evolves as broadcasters and regulators navigate the next steps.


Sources