Charles weighs banning the Yorks from private royal events amid Epstein fallout

King Charles could ban the Yorks from private family occasions as a last sanction amid fears of further Jeffrey Epstein–related disclosures. Buckingham Palace has not issued a public comment, but royal insiders describe rising frustration over new revelations involving emails from Sarah, Duchess of York, to Epstein following his release from prison on offenses tied to sexual crimes against a minor.

The focal point of the disclosures is a 2011 exchange in which Ferguson wrote to Epstein to offer a grovelling apology after publicly disassociating herself from the financier when it emerged he had bailed her out financially. The duchess later described the affair as a gigantic error of judgment, and as a defense, a spokesperson for Ferguson said the email was sent to counter an aggressive defamation threat Epstein had made against her. The former wife of a non-working royal has limited ability to influence what Charles’s family says or does in public or private, but the messages underscore the closeness between the Yorks and the wider royal circle and the reputational risk it poses for the monarchy.

[IMAGE_PLACEHOLDER]

The revelations come as the Yorks have long been a source of tension within royal life. Ferguson’s public persona and her ties to Andrew, Duke of York, have repeatedly tested the boundaries of what the monarchy can tolerate. The late Queen and King Charles have faced a difficult balance: allowing moments of family solidarity with Beatrice and Eugenie and other grandchildren, while limiting the Yorks’ proximity to official duties and public appearances. Ferguson was historically treated with caution during Prince Philip’s life, yet Queen Elizabeth II occasionally allowed her to accompany the family at Balmoral or Sandringham when the Duke of Edinburgh wasn’t present, a gesture that colleagues say reflected a desire to be charitable toward a relative who had faced mounting personal scrutiny.

Sources say the current king has explored a range of options intended to curb the Yorks’ influence, including, in extreme terms, ending private funding to reduce the incentive to engage in costly schemes or risky associations, withdrawing security, and pressing Andrew to downsize from Royal Lodge—a 30-room Windsor property—by offering alternate accommodation such as Frogmore Cottage, the former home of Prince Harry and Meghan. However, Andrew has resisted, arguing he holds a “cast iron” lease and can meet his obligations, setting the stage for what one insider described as a protracted standoff between brothers. An insider said there is “literally no more the king can do to cut off support” if Andrew insists on staying near the core of family life.

The possibility of barring the Yorks from private family occasions would be framed as a last sanction, a response to the continuing discomfort caused by their association with Epstein. There is a real fear among some members of the royal orbit that additional material could surface, intensifying scrutiny of the Yorks’ closeness to the monarchy. The concern is not only about private events but about how the family navigates the optics of high-profile reunions and gatherings. In recent years, both Andrew and Ferguson have occasionally appeared with the royal family at圣s including Christmas church walks at Sandringham and Easter at Windsor Castle, a pattern that makes any move to curtail private access particularly delicate.

Beyond the internal governance issues, U.S. investigators are said to be examining a cache of emails that could further complicate the family’s standing if made public. Some insiders have suggested Charles may have to find ways to prevent his brother from attending private events entirely or to do so in a back-channel manner. A source described the potential step as the last sanction available, while noting the “real fear” that more Epstein-related material could emerge and widen the scrutiny.

The dynamic reflects the broader challenge facing Charles as monarch: preserve the dignity and unity of a modern constitutional institution while managing legacies and relationships that stretch back decades. The Yorks have been a recurring source of tension, and the latest disclosures test the boundaries of charitable work, public appearances, and private conduct. As the royal household weighs its options, Buckingham Palace has emphasized caution and a preference for privacy as it navigates a highly sensitive, evolving narrative around Epstein and the York family.