Drone attacks expose Denmark's vulnerabilities, prompting response debate
Denmark faces hybrid threats as drones disrupt airports and military sites, prompting discussions on defense and NATO alignment.

A wave of drone incursions over western Denmark disrupted airports and military sites overnight, but caused no injuries or damage, exposing vulnerabilities in the country’s defenses. Aalborg and Billund airports were forced to close, while drones were spotted over Esbjerg, Sonderborg and Skrydstrup. Aalborg also serves as a military base, and Skrydstrup houses some of the air force’s F-35 and F-16 aircraft. Drones were observed over the Jutland Dragoon regiment at Holstebro as well. Police investigators have begun examining the incidents, including reports of drone activity near Denmark’s North Sea oil and gas platforms and near the central port of Korsor.
The disruptions prompted a late-night briefing by Denmark’s defense leadership. Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen said the events looked systematic in scope, describing them as a hybrid attack. Officials stressed that no harm occurred because the drones were allowed to fly their courses rather than being shot down, a stance police and military leaders say buys time to assess risk but is not sustainable in the long term. The government is weighing how to respond and whether to invoke NATO’s Article 4 consultations, a step Estonia and Poland have already taken in recent weeks after incursions near their airspace. Danish authorities have not confirmed Russian involvement, though they have not ruled out any possibility. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen noted the incidents as a risk to European security and said the situation will require serious attention.
The episode has exposed how Denmark lags behind some neighbors in drone defense capabilities and prompted debate about how to deter hybrid threats. Analysts say it would be easier to design technologies that prevent drone flights than to shoot them down once in the air, a challenge Denmark acknowledged. The government has announced plans for an integrated layered air defence and for investing in long-range weapons to reach adversary territory, but those tools will not arrive in time to address the latest wave of incursions. Experts from the University of South Denmark argue that local authorities must balance public safety with potential collateral damage when deciding whether to shoot down drones over urban areas or near airports.
The Danish government is due to join NATO allies and Ukraine on Friday to discuss a proposed drone wall, a concept backed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that aims to improve early detection along Europe’s eastern borders. The plan emphasizes sensors and information sharing rather than a single defense system and should complement, not replace, existing air defense. If the attacks are linked to Russia, analysts say the operation would reflect the hybrid warfare playbook: disrupt infrastructure to erode public confidence and test political resolve. European partners have warned Moscow that further violations would carry consequences, and the issue has drawn attention to the broader security posture of NATO’s eastern flank.
Denmark’s crisis-management machinery has shifted to a higher gear. Police have raised their crisis level, and defense officials have signaled readiness to pursue takedowns where safe. The latest incidents come as Denmark and its Nordic neighbors recalibrate their approach to security in a period of rapid technological change and rising hybrid threats. Observers note that the episode functions as a wake-up call for increased resilience, reinforced air defence planning, and closer coordination with NATO allies as the alliance reassesses vulnerability along its periphery.

The world watches how Denmark responds to hybrid warfare challenges, with the aim of safeguarding critical infrastructure and reinforcing regional security.