Homeless tipster who helped solve Brown University shooting could receive $50,000 reward; now housed by federal authorities
Federal authorities are housing the anonymous tipster, who aided investigators in identifying the gunman, as officials weigh the FBI reward and the case timeline extends across New England.

A homeless tipster who aided investigators in solving the Brown University shooting case is now reportedly housed by federal authorities and could receive a $50,000 reward. The man, identified in public discussions only by the alias John, helped connect gunman Claudio Neves Valente to the attack after a five-day manhunt, according to multiple media reports. The tip’s impact has been described by officials as pivotal in narrowing the suspect’s movements and enabling authorities to tie the violence to a single assailant rather than a broader plot. The development comes as Providence officials and federal agencies weigh how to recognize the information that ultimately broke the case.
Officials described the tip as a turning point in the investigation. Providence police and other agencies say the information helped them track the suspect’s movements through the city and identify a key vehicle involved in the broader pursuit. Investigators say John interacted with Neves Valente in Brown University’s Barus and Holley building and later encountered him nearby outside the campus, in a tense exchange that ended when the gunman fled. The tip also helped authorities link the attack to a gray Nissan with Florida plates, a detail that allowed investigators to access surveillance footage from more than 70 street cameras operated by the security network Flock Safety. The FBI and local police collected video, analyzed plate data, and cross-referenced the tip’s specifics with other leads, ultimately accelerating the identification process.
Following the public breakout of the tip, John’s Reddit posts drew widespread attention. He wrote about recognizing the suspect and suggested investigative angles, including the possibility that the shooter used a rental grey Nissan. Reddit users urged him to share information with the FBI, and John did so, noting the Florida plates and specific car dynamics he observed when the suspect approached a vehicle and then relocked it. The online activity helped fuel a broader public awareness campaign around the suspect’s movements and the ongoing investigation. Authorities have emphasized that while John’s tip was crucial, hundreds of other tips were evaluated, with officials stressing that John’s contribution stood out in terms of specificity and timing.
Neves Valente, 48, a Portuguese national, was identified as the shooter and had previously attended Brown University as a graduate student in physics from 2000 to 2001. He studied at Instituto Superior Técnico in Portugal earlier in his academic career and was let go in 2000 from that institution, according to university records. He entered the United States on a student visa and later obtained lawful permanent residence in September 2017, according to officials. The last reported residence for him before the case drew national attention was in Miami. While Brown University’s current leadership confirmed that Valente had no active affiliation with the school at the time of the attacks, the traces of his academic history were part of a broader review of his and the university’s past associations. The case has prompted ongoing discussions about immigration pathways and how individuals move through academic programs into other life trajectories.
Two days after the Brown University shooting in Providence, investigators believe Neves Valente killed Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro at his Brookline, Massachusetts home, about 50 miles away. Authorities described the events as coordinated in time but still believed Valente acted alone. Investigators have not presented evidence publicly to suggest a broader conspiracy, but the case prompted renewed scrutiny of safety protocols on campuses in New England and the ways in which rapid-fire violence can ripple across neighboring communities. The investigation into the two shootings has been methodical, with authorities outlining a timeline that places the Brown tragedy first, followed by the Loureiro homicide, and then the eventual identification of Valente as the suspect in both cases.
In the days that followed, authorities located Valente in a storage unit in New Hampshire, where he died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound Thursday evening. Police said the death appears to be self-inflicted and concluded that Valente acted alone in the Brown shooting and the later MIT alumnus murder. The discovery closed the life of a man the FBI and local law enforcement had pursued for days, but the investigation remains active in the sense that the agencies are piecing together Valente’s history and the possible networks that could have influenced or supported his actions. The Rhode Island and Massachusetts institutions involved described the case as one of the most challenging in recent memory due to the cross-state nature of the events and the need to corroborate a complex web of tips, sightings, and surveillance footage.
Providence Mayor Brett Smiley publicly urged FBI Director Kash Patel to award the tipster, praising the anonymous figure for his bravery and sense of civic duty. In communications with federal authorities, Smiley described John as a true community hero whose actions went beyond the expectations of ordinary citizens. The mayor’s appeal reflects a broader sentiment in the local community about recognizing the risk and courage shown by tipsters who provide information that can deter further violence and help authorities close cases swiftly.
The case also touched on immigration policy politics. Following the public identification of Valente, President Donald Trump suspended the green card lottery program that had allowed Valente to reside in the United States. The decision drew attention to the intersection of immigration policy and national security, as officials sought to ensure that information supplied by the public is integrated into the broader framework of security checks and visa oversight. The interplay between visa history and violent acts remains a point of discussion for policymakers and law enforcement officials alike, even as investigators pursue a clear, evidence-based account of the individual at the center of this set of incidents.
Across social and traditional media, the public response to John’s story has been intense. Supporters who felt unsure about the role of a lone tipster celebrated the speed with which investigators moved from a broad search to a precise identification of the suspect. Critics cautioned against elevating informal, unverified online chatter, emphasizing that the official investigation relied on a combination of eyewitness accounts, digital forensics, vehicle data, and surveillance footage. In Providence, community leaders stressed the importance of constructive engagement with public safety issues and highlighted the need for protections for vulnerable populations who might be critical to the investigative process in the future. The city has signaled its continued commitment to transparency and to recognizing individuals who contribute meaningfully to public safety, while maintaining caution about the complexities involved in any case that spans multiple jurisdictions.
As investigators conclude their review of the case, questions remain about the precise paths that linked the Brown shooting to Valente’s later actions, and how similar events might be prevented in the future. The federal effort to formally acknowledge John’s contribution marks a rare instance in which a tipster who was initially homeless and living on the margins became a recognized factor in resolving a high-profile national-security matter. Officials say the reward decision, while still pending, underscores the value placed on citizen cooperation in countering violence and the important role that community members can play in helping authorities resolve critical incidents quickly and accurately. The broader public safety community will be watching closely as additional details emerge from ongoing investigations and from the federal review of the reward process.